Croatian chess player
Antonio Radić publishes his comments on chess games on a Youtube chess channel under
the pseudonym "agadmator"; his podcasts are highly popular. For
example, his "The Greatest Queen Sacrifice in History" has
over 4.5 million visits, and all of his videos together have already received
275 million visits (here).
Radić's podcasts are
completely non-political, which is why their author was absolutely dismayed
when his chess commentary of June 27 was removed from Youtube by Google as
"harmful and dangerous". "Agadmator" shared his shock with
his fans the day after (here),
reflecting on possible reasons why Google has chosen to delete the podcast and
believing it was a software bug that may have discerned potentially incorrect
words in the comment, and so by mistake and out of context, it delegitimized
the entire podcast. Radić cites the assumption of his supporters (he is afraid
to express such ideas in his name) that perhaps usual chess sentences, such as
"the black cannot face the pressure of the white" or "the black
must lose", were interpreted by the censoring robot as politically
incorrect or racist. Hundreds of thousands of fans witnessed Radić's
misunderstanding and sadness, and under their pressure Youtube returned the
podcast on June 29 (here).
The aggressive
progressives (or progressive aggressors) are beginning to condemn classical
music because it was composed only by White men, and this can hardly be undone by
an occasional gay among the composers. Now the time for chess has come (Es
kommt der tag, said Nazis) – and a number of changes can be expected. Black
will move first, and if that doesn't help, white and black will be replaced by
blue and green. Another solution could be positive discrimination, ordering the
White people to start a game without one pawn, Asians without two, and Jews
without three pawns; if that will not help, African Americans will start with
two queens.
Radić's case clearly
shows that Western democracy is on the verge of ending. Not only are some statements
banned, but innocent phrases containing non-recommended words are censored, while
most information passes through several giant engines, such as Google and
Facebook. Physical erasure is performed by a robot analyzing written and spoken
texts as in the worst anti-utopias, and in the future it will probably not be
possible to discuss the legitimacy of the erasure with any humans.
Deleting posts on
Facebook becomes ever more common, and the above chess scandal shows that
Google also becomes very active and even activist. It's not just about Youtube,
it's also about searching on Google. After all, Google has already taken up 93%
of the market from search engines on the Internet; in second place is Bing with
only 2.5% and in third place Yahoo with 1.5% of the market (here). Anyone
looking for anything anywhere in the world relies on the results found by
Google, which was already discredited by its cooperation with the Chinese
Communist government in their efforts to select only suitable Internet search
results for their subjects (here).
It has always been
claimed that Google has a very sophisticated secret algorithm for ranking
websites and arranging them in the final search result. Such a rating is
critical, because any Google search will yield thousands to millions of
results, of which the top ten are usually reviewed, so the others don't seem to
exist. Two years ago, I tried to explore a little said algorithm in terms of
keywords in the title; I confirmed that using six to nine words from the title
will usually ensure the article is present among the top ten sites in the
search result (here).
However, while "exploring"
that algorithm, I repeatedly received a question from Google "Are you
human?", and later my website stopped to be included in search results,
even though I searched for long titles, which figured first in both Bing and
Yahoo search engines. Google advises that it can lower the ratings of websites
whose owner violates some of the rules, and may even completely omit the site
from further browsing (deindexing). I deduced that my repeated searches could
be considered by the protection software as "Sending automated queries to
Google", which is prohibited. After submitting my explanation and request
in Console application, the reduction in the rating of my Czech and Hebrew articles
has been removed, and it seems softer for my English articles.
As a patent attorney,
I looked at Google's patents and found that the company made no secret of its
efforts to change the placement of certain documents in the final search result
(such as here and here) according to the
requirements. For example, the first of these patents relates to an algorithm providing
results as currently needed; the second patent provides an algorithm enabling to
change the position of a particular document in the final search result by
applying a "rank transition function".
Giant companies such
as Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft or Google are probably interested mainly in
profits, but given the left-wing tendencies of today's tycoons, these companies
also support everything politically correct and progressive. This combination,
of course, tends to support Democrats in America and China in the world. No
matter how the views and interests of these giants evolve, the concentration of
their power is critically dangerous for the continued existence of Western
democracy, which seems to be close to its checkmate.
I read the above article and got some knowledge from your article which is about Complete Guide To Scandinavian Defense. It's actually great and useful data for us. Thanks for sharing it.
ReplyDeleteYou have given great content here. I am glad to discover this post as I found lots of valuable data in your article. Thanks for sharing an article like this.Side Scrolling Action Games
ReplyDeleteYour artical contain lot of info ,really nice artical Apkelaka
ReplyDelete