The term "deep state" denotes institutions
and groups of people deeply embedded in the structure of the state and seeking
to maintain a certain policy independently of democratic elections. It is a
state within a state. This is the way, the American commentator and columnist
Michael Savage related to the globalist elite in the United States that opposed
Donald Trump. In Trump’s War, Savage included among said progressive elite a
layer of civil servants in defense and security, social engineers
and, above all, the orchestrating media. According to Savage, the deep state stands for globalist culture of collectivism, multiculturalism and controlled economy, as opposed to the traditional values of individual freedom, free enterprise and Judeo-Christian traditions. Savage's definition is also well suited to the Israeli conditions.
and, above all, the orchestrating media. According to Savage, the deep state stands for globalist culture of collectivism, multiculturalism and controlled economy, as opposed to the traditional values of individual freedom, free enterprise and Judeo-Christian traditions. Savage's definition is also well suited to the Israeli conditions.
Whereas the United States seem to be rather retreating
from freedom to socialism, Israel once started with socialism and gradually
detached from it. Enthusiastic socialist founders wanted to create a new Jewish
man who would make his living by manual work while being indistinguishable from
his non-Jewish neighbors, including Arabs, with whom he would make friends. The
efforts to make friends with Arab neighbors became an obsession that proved
incurable in the Israeli political elites. No Arab violence helped, including the
pogroms of 1929, when the Arabs unexpectedly attacked their long-time Jewish
friends and neighbors, raping, gouging eyes, and severing limbs; tens of
thousands of dead and wounded during a hundred years of neighborly coexistence
have not helped. Fraternity became the highest goal of the Israeli elites.
Writers such as the famous Amos Oz dreamed in their morbid fantasy of an Arab friend
of Israel – a muscular and noble hero; the dream sharply contrasted with
physical disabilities of the Arab population caused by the intra-family
marriages, as well as with their ethics of which ultimate virtue was killing a disobedient
girl by father or brother.
Chaos and bureaucracy in Israel were getting
weaker during the years, and African dirt on the streets began to disappear,
with strengthening of the free market. Some kibbutz informality became part of the
Israel's DNA, but the incessant struggle for survival changed the DNA also in another
way – the Israeli voters have slowly turned away from traditional communist and
socialist parties and moved to the center and to the right (see the graph).
A lion putting zebra’s rights above its own would scarcely survive in evolution; the political right is more realistic and
defends the interests of the nation better than the dogmatic left. As a byproduct,
the nation got a healthier economy.
The main representative of the Israeli right
is Benjamin Netanyahu, called Bibi, who in 1996-2019, mostly as leader of the
Likud party, made a substantial contribution to consolidating the capitalist
economy – as Prime Minister in 1996-1999 and 2009-2019, and as Minister of
Finance in 2002-2005. Even his enemies, mostly rich people enjoying the overall
growth, have no doubt about his economic success. For example, inflation fell
from 10.6% to 1.3% in 1996-1999, and later down to zero. Privatization, tax
cuts, and opening the market to import have led to reduced unemployment,
increased national income, and improved supply. Before Bibi there was a lack of
natural gas, which the Egyptians refused to deliver to Israel despite the peace
treaty, and there was a critical lack of water; everything was expensive. Today
Israel can export water and gas, use cellular phones nearly free, and 8.5
million out of 9 million citizens travel abroad annually. Israel has become a
technological and local military power.
So why does the left hate Bibi more than other
right-wing politicians? Because the left cannot put up with the fact that, despite
their stereotypical presentation of right-wing people as simpletons, Bibi masters
better English than their idol Shimon Peres. Because Bibi studied architecture
at the world's most prestigious university (MIT). Because his son was among the
winners of the Bible knowledge contest. Because the left is easily ridiculed by
his sarcasm. Because the U.S. Congress applauded him, when he arrived there
against the will of US President Obama. Because he has friendly relations with
both the US and Russian presidents. Because Arab and Iranian leaders denote him
as the archenemy, while he is loved by Israeli people in the street. Because Bibi
repeatedly wins democratic elections.
Here comes the Israeli "deep state".
It is globalist progressive elite as defined by Savage, including defense and
security apparatchiks, social scientists and cultural agents, and media – all of
these rooted in the Stalinist era and backed by the Supreme Court, which has
been interfering in the powers of both the executive and the legislature over
the past 25 years. The Supreme Court is assisted by the prosecution and by
police, including a special investigation unit called Lahav 433, and by the offices
of the state attorney and the attorney general. Nominating personnel to crucial
positions is in the hands of legalistic and security elites who defend their
positions teeth and nails, concocting accusations against politicians according
to their needs, and whose influence has been vainly fought by elected
representatives for years. Said elites promote political views of the extreme
left represented by the political party Merec, now supported only by four
percent of voters. The Supreme Court regularly makes judgments favorable to Arab
terrorists, but the most destructive is its meddling in everyday economic life,
an example being attempts to prevent the use of natural gas recently found off
the Israeli coast. The gas “belongs to the people” according to the Supreme Court,
and its extraction would serve the rightwing government.
Since the beginning of his career, Netanyahu
has faced daily accusations, enthusiastically promoted by the media, suggesting
he would right away go to the prison – but the rumors have repeatedly turned
out to be exaggerations and defamations. Wiretapping Bibi, his wife and
children, and publishing their private conversations have become commonplace,
as well as testimonies about their offenses and crimes provided by cleaning
personnel and other staff around the Netanyahu family. Bibi's wife Sarah was
accused by media of not returning the bottle deposit bills to the state, and of
buying too expensive candles for Saturday. The left accused Bibi of allowing
Germany to sell a submarine to Egypt, which was absurd, since the left regarded
Egypt as a peaceful partner, and Bibi could have hardly prevented the sale
anyway. When Netanyahu greatly increased Israeli strategic strength by
purchasing German submarines, the left accused him of enriching himself, but a
thorough police investigation cleared him.
From countless artificial affairs, the prosecution
has recently managed to extract three alleged crimes, and on November 21
indicted Netanyahu. The three affairs are "case 1000", "case
2000" and "case 4000". In the first case, Bibi received cigars
and champagne from entrepreneur Arnon Milchan in 2011-2016, for which he
allegedly assisted him in promoting his business. In the second case, Bibi had
a meeting, in 2014, with his political enemy, Yediot Ahronot newspaper
publisher Arnon Mozes, who offered him favorable articles in exchange for
limiting the influence of Mozes' biggest competitor – Yisrael Hayom paper; Bibi
did not accept the deal, but he should have refused the offer faster according
to the indictment. In the third case, Bibi was supposed to help communication
tycoon Shaul Elovitch in his business in exchange for favorable articles in
Walla's online newspaper. Paradoxically, Yisrael Hayom, whose influence Bibi allegedly
sought to suppress, is the only newspaper not biased against him, so it is absurd
to suppose he would consider such an offer. In addition, Yediot Ahronot and
Walla have never published any favorable articles about Bibi. The prosecution succeeded
to come only with "fraud and breach of trust" in the first two cases,
while adding "bribe" in the third one.
The Bibi’s Bill of Indictment was signed by Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, State Attorney Shai Nitzan, and Tel Aviv District Attorney Liat Ben-Ari – all three being dubious persons with a past of criminal investigations. Mandelblit was investigated in 2014, and accused of fraud and breach of trust in the Harpaz affair, but his case was closed, probably due to his previous assistance to the anti-Israeli radical left-wing organizations MachsomWatch and BeTzelem in their activities against the Israeli Army, when he served in the position of Chief Army Attorney. Nitzan threw away his kippa and abandoned religion to simplify his career, which enabled him to work with Aharon Bark – the father of the activism of Israeli leftist judges; in his position he acted particularly cruelly against religious Jews in the settlements to make up for his religious origin. He was found to act arbitrary against right activists by Kfar Saba court in 2014. Liat Ben-Ari was caught threatening a colleague of her in her position at the district prosecution office and giving a false declaration to the court; Mandelblit and Nitzan provided her with their protection, refusing to open a criminal case against her. Both Nitzan and Ben-Ari were caught lying, when they did not pass a polygraph test.
Much of the public is outraged, as remembering
how former Prime Minister Olmert was charged for million dollar bribes in cash,
and how the District Court's six-year sentence was reduced to eight months
under pressure from the Supreme Court because Olmert's family was active in
extreme leftwing organizations. In the case of Netanyahu, none of the charges have
been proven, and the activities in which he is supposed to be involved, are even
not illegal according to lawyers unrelated to the establishment. It is a
head-to-head clash between a democratically elected prime minister and leftwing
elites embedded in the structure of the state more deeply than most people want
to admit, the elites willing to use all means to save their influence. The
means includes the skillful use of the politician Avigdor Lieberman, easily blackmailed
for having received millions of dollars for undisclosed purposes from the Austrian
billionaire Martin Schlaff, former Stassi agent. The Lieberman's criminal
investigation was closed and Lieberman, formerly marked by media as an extreme
rightwinger and fascist, was acquitted, after which he "surprisingly"
turned against the right government, causing its fall and thus premature
elections – even three times during the last year.
The left has no chance in regular democratic elections,
so it relies on its “deep state”. Bibi has brought the country to economic prosperity,
has gained Russian approval for Israeli operations in Syria, has forced the
Americans to move the embassy to Jerusalem, to withdraw from the treaty with
Iran, and to recognize Israeli sovereignty on the Golan heights, but over the
years he has not braced himself for attacking the strongest enemy – the deep
state. In any case, it will now be a fatal battle, not just for Bibi, but also for
the democratic Israel. Either the present right government will remain in power
in some form, hoping to break the power of leftwing judges and secure the
Jewish future in Israel, or there will be a period of opportunistic politicians
without any vision in the economy and politics, willing to negotiate with the
Arabs and make any concessions, while endangering Israel’s existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment